The U.S. seems to erupt in a raging debate over gun control and gun violence in the U.S every time there is any kind of shooting that can further agendas. The republican party and the democratic party seem to lock themselves on opposite sides of this debate every time there is a mass shooting or any shooting for that matter. I debated at length researching all the statistical data, and compiling facts for this blog, but it seems no one is interested in those facts, and statistics can be skewed in either direction, so I won't waste my time.
In light of the most recent event out in California where two terrorist engaged in a mass shooting Obama calls our Gun Laws insane. The fact that he thinks he knows better then the founding fathers who gave us the right to have arms is disconcerting to me. Yet, this post isn't about him. Many flock to support him saying we need stricter gun laws, calling for a ban on guns, or proposing other more extreme solutions. The Republicans on the other hand get slammed for offering prayers and are slammed for for not acting on these stricter gun law proposals with people trying to make them accountable for the actions of two terrorist (way to hold the people who perpetrated the crime accountable). Gun advocates argue that some of the states with the strictest gun laws have the highest crime rate with them, and further argue that stricter gun laws are not the answer.
Here is what it comes down to. We have a constitutional right to have arms, we have had that right since this county was named. I think some of the opposition from both sides comes from massive misunderstanding and a stubborn refusal to try and see either side. I think some of the opposition from both sides comes from ignorance and I think a great deal of of opposition comes from fear.
Fear being one of our greatest enemies no matter what side of the fence you are on. Anti-gun supporters are often afraid of guns, and it seems afraid of almost everything else, they view stricter gun control as a way for the to control the big bad scary world out there. I think the down side of this mentality is that when you seek ultimate control you loss control completely. These decision have consequences that reach far beyond the short sight of fear and ignorance. You call for stricter gun control for the law abiding citizens and expect the criminals will turn in their illegal guns? OR did you figure oh, well, at least if the law abiding citizens don't have guns only the police and criminals will have guns, what could possibly go wrong there? It just doesn't follow logic. Perhaps you have this misguided stereotypical image in your head of what a gun owner looks like. Not sure, take a look at the below.
If this first row is what you think a law abiding gun owner looks like, you are misinformed, misguided and judging people based on stereotypes.




If this second row is what you think a law abiding gun owner looks like, congratulations, this is more likely the case. If you do not, you are part of a bigger problem.

Now that we have addressed one side of the fence lets look at the other side of the fence. Avid gun supporters often come across as zealots of a different kind. I can't say that I blame the average law abiding gun supporter for being upset at the stereotypes and misunderstanding in society. However, their approach often hurts them. They believe they are good and responsible people and so they apply their logic across the board. They often have knee jerk reactions to the media and press as the war on guns rages with every single report of mass shootings, while many of the preventative incidents are swept under the rug to further political movement. I have come across stories only because I seek them out, were a law abiding gun owner has acted in favor of the masses. These stores are found only if I search for them, and even if gun advocates share these stories they don't get the air time the more negative consequences do. Most of these avid gun owners believe that a well armed society is a safer society, this can be difficult to digest for people who are afraid of guns. Most avid gun owners engage in regular training, and take their ownership very seriously, but the public doesn't seem to get that message. Instead criminal activity is tied to gun ownership in the media providing a skewed perception of what a true law abiding gun owner is and giving the illusion that stricter gun laws will somehow cut down on the level of crime that is being committed. I can assure you this is only an illusion.
All in all both sides lock themselves in their positions, anti gun advocates spewing out statistics supporting their cause that are skewed in their favor. Avid pro gun owners countering with statistics that support their cause. Both sides seeking to protect the country in their own ways. The anti gun owner seeks to protect by taking rights away, and pro gun owners seek to educate and encourage more people to their side.
My Bottom Line. Stricter gun control laws in general is not the answer. California has some of the more strict gun laws and tragedy still struck, as an aside, the guns used in the California mass shootings were illegal in that state. If people can't kill you with guns they will find another way if they are determined. Criminals don't care about laws and neither do terrorist. Disarming law abiding citizens only serves to hurt the country as a whole by providing even more potential targets for those that wish to do them harm. An informed, trained and responsible body of gun owner can and does serve as a powerful defense and deterrent against criminal activity and terrorist attacks. Need an example? If you were a criminal or terrorist would you target the city where almost everyone owned a gun, or the one where almost no one owns a gun?
Concessions (and I usually don't have these but I am trying to be flexible) - I am willing to hear SPECIFICALLY what stricter gun control laws are being considered, for example a strict policy on foreign citizens (given our particular fight on terrorism) is something I would consider. Changes to gun policy regarding mental health are something I would consider.